I am a psychology major and, for
one reason or another, some people are led to believe that this gives me the
ability to read people’s thoughts and manipulate their behavior. And for the
most part, I am very grateful that this belief is untrue. However, Jen
Shang, the world’s only philanthropic psychologist, studies how donor behavior
is affected using psychological principles. This interview with Shang published in the New York Times provides an interesting perspective on how psychology
contributes to donor behavior – reinforcing the importance of many of the
factors that have been emphasized in previous posts of this blog.
Even though Shang hits upon certain
words that can be used in order to increase support, I don’t think the main
takeaway from this article is how to manipulate their charitable contributions.
If anything, it is the exact opposite. Instead of focusing on the facts that
studies show that collectively women are more likely to give if the
solicitation letter mentions honesty, I think Shang is trying to highlight that
the individuality of each donor still needs to be respected and maintained.
Don’t use these buzzwords because that is what an article says you should or
even because that is what a donor would like to hear. Say it because you mean
it. For a donor, philanthropy is a journey, a series of decisions – such as reading
outreach material, volunteering, and then giving financial support. Understand
that a donation means something different for each donor and that they might be
coming at the opportunity from different perspectives. It is hard to walk that
fine line between presenting information in order to get people on board with
the mission of the organization and deliberately presenting the information in
a way that misleads them into donating. Build a trusting relationship keeping
in mind their different perspectives and motivations for their contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment